Closed alyst closed 3 years ago
Right. The BioJulia contribution guidelines state that the dedicated maintainer chooses the git branching model.
Since both Ben Ward and Kenta Sato have been inactive, I guess the dedicated maintainer is me.
Let's have the OneFlow model - developments are merged into master, and we have only the master branch, temporary feature/bugfix branches, and perhaps occasionally one for an upcoming release.
What is the status of these branches? Right now PRs are merged into "master", but e.g.
docs/make.jl
are still configured to treat "develop" as development branch, and the docs/readme mention "develop" as the development branch.I think it should be configured to be consistent with the rest of BioJulia, the ambiguous branch should be removed, and docs updated.