In Bioschemas, following what is done in RO-Crate, about should be used to specified the nature of the content of the dataset, uisng DefinedTerm whenever possible. For instance, if a dataset contains information about mice, the about could be ncit:10090. Ideally this info should go as part of the Bioschemas description but currently there is no way to capture those.
In Bioschemas, following what is done in RO-Crate, about should be used to specified the nature of the content of the dataset, uisng DefinedTerm whenever possible. For instance, if a dataset contains information about mice, the about could be ncit:10090.
Have these been tested?
No
What should reviewers focus on?
Validity of the specification
Types of changes
[ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[X] New content (non-breaking change which adds new content)
[ ] Modified content (non-breaking change which modifies existing content)
[ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
Add about as recommended.
In Bioschemas, following what is done in RO-Crate, about should be used to specified the nature of the content of the dataset, uisng DefinedTerm whenever possible. For instance, if a dataset contains information about mice, the about could be ncit:10090. Ideally this info should go as part of the Bioschemas description but currently there is no way to capture those.
This change is discussed in https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/629
Internal reference
e.g. https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/596
Description
Motivation and context
In Bioschemas, following what is done in RO-Crate, about should be used to specified the nature of the content of the dataset, uisng DefinedTerm whenever possible. For instance, if a dataset contains information about mice, the about could be ncit:10090.
Have these been tested?
No
What should reviewers focus on?
Validity of the specification
Types of changes
Future TO-DOs