Closed rodrigarc closed 2 years ago
Hi @rodrigarc
Thanks for submitting your package. We are taking a quick look at it and you will hear back from us soon.
The DESCRIPTION file for this package is:
Package: scifer
Type: Package
Title: Scifer: Single-Cell Immunoglobulin Filtering of Sanger Sequences
Version: 0.99.0
Authors@R:
c(person(given = "Rodrigo",
family = "Arcoverde Cerveira",
role = c("aut", "cre", "cph"),
email = "rodrigo.arcoverdi@gmail.com",
comment = c(ORCID = "0000-0002-1145-2534")))
URL: https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer
BugReports: https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/issues
Description: Have you ever index sorted cells in a 96 or 384-well plate and then sequenced using Sanger sequencing?
If so, you probably had some struggle to either check the chromatogram of each cell sequenced manually,
or when you tried to identify which cell was sorted where after sequencing the plate.
Scifer was developed to solve this issue by performing basic quality control of Sanger sequences
and merging flow cytometry data from probed single-cell sorted B cells with sequencing data.
scifer can export summary tables, 'fasta' files, chromatograms for visual inspection, and generate reports.
License: MIT + file LICENSE
Encoding: UTF-8
Depends:
biocViews:
Preprocessing,
QualityControl,
SangerSeq,
Sequencing,
Software,
FlowCytometry,
SingleCell
Imports: dplyr,
rmarkdown,
data.table,
Biostrings,
parallel,
stats,
plyr,
knitr,
ggplot2,
gridExtra,
DECIPHER,
stringr,
sangerseqR,
kableExtra,
tibble,
scales,
rlang,
flowCore
RoxygenNote: 7.1.2
VignetteBuilder: knitr
Please read your vignette. You print out an entire dataset in the vignette.
Hi @vjcitn, I have updated that on my vignette and committed this change to my repo. Do I have to push to git.bioconductor.org already or at this stage this is not needed yet?
A reviewer has been assigned to your package. Learn what to expect during the review process.
IMPORTANT: Please read this documentation for setting up remotes to push to git.bioconductor.org. It is required to push a version bump to git.bioconductor.org to trigger a new build.
Bioconductor utilized your github ssh-keys for git.bioconductor.org access. To manage keys and future access you may want to active your Bioconductor Git Credentials Account
Dear Package contributor,
This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.
Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.
On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". This may mean there is a problem with the package that you need to fix. Or it may mean that there is a problem with the build system itself.
Please see the build report for more details. This link will be active for 21 days.
Remember: if you submitted your package after July 7th, 2020,
when making changes to your repository push to
git@git.bioconductor.org:packages/scifer
to trigger a new build.
A quick tutorial for setting up remotes and pushing to upstream can be found here.
Received a valid push on git.bioconductor.org; starting a build for commit id: cdd65c50e96e77f97c0df8a6a9b832d0aa29058e
Dear Package contributor,
This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.
Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.
Congratulations! The package built without errors or warnings on all platforms.
Please see the build report for more details. This link will be active for 21 days.
Remember: if you submitted your package after July 7th, 2020,
when making changes to your repository push to
git@git.bioconductor.org:packages/scifer
to trigger a new build.
A quick tutorial for setting up remotes and pushing to upstream can be found here.
Scifer review
This looks pretty high standard for an initial submission and most things look good.
If there are any notes you can clear up then that would be great.
News.md
Vignette
Inst
Tests
R code
Thank you for your review, @ococrook! I will edit the package according to your comments and come back here when they are all addressed.
- [ ] Functions would better do one task, so functions that have plotting outputs would be better separated and then return (rather than print ) the ggplot object. This is useful if you end up calling these functions many times and actually you would rather not generate plots but an object which you can plot at a later date.
@ococrook Just to see if I understood correctly, do you mean I should separate fcs_processing()
into two functions, one for the processing itself and another one for plotting? In addition to that, also change this new plotting function to return the object instead of printing the plot. Is that it?
Exactly, I think this would be much better and easier for development in the future.
Received a valid push on git.bioconductor.org; starting a build for commit id: 1db5c891d50fb76f98d7e2b97bdefbff147517a6
Dear Package contributor,
This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.
Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows.
Congratulations! The package built without errors or warnings on all platforms.
Please see the build report for more details. This link will be active for 21 days.
Remember: if you submitted your package after July 7th, 2020,
when making changes to your repository push to
git@git.bioconductor.org:packages/scifer
to trigger a new build.
A quick tutorial for setting up remotes and pushing to upstream can be found here.
Scifer review
This looks pretty high standard for an initial submission and most things look good. If there are any notes you can clear up then that would be great.
Thank you again for taking the time to evaluate scifer
, @ococrook!
I managed to remove 3 of the notes. Some of them I did not manage to remove, such as "runnable example", since one of the functions writes some files, I just changed to donttest{}
instead of donrun{}
.
News.md
- [x] make sure package versions match
Package DESCRIPTION and NEWS are now matching (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/316c898c54a1c7f67b55c218a00204dec1c8495d). I also changed NEWS to NEWS.md (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/e1e40c3f36d41f3f90d0f3017c710e76878f2afd)
Vignette
- [x] The name is a bit generic can you make it specific
File name was changed to scifer_walkthrough.Rmd
(https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/1e68052c346f91971deffa9875494528ee55d0e1)
- [x] Double check spelling (vigenette?)
I went through the vignette and other files fixing some spelling errors I could find. (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/1e68052c346f91971deffa9875494528ee55d0e1)
- [x] Add bioconductor specific install instructions
Added (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/7f9877ec73b9393b53e944bd524556e8e5ba9ec9)
- [x] Use the bioconductor style guide please
Here (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/8f3c993ae77313bf4f2e16b38184f68079758812)
Inst
- [x] Can you add a readme to this folder so it’s easy to navigate
Added (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/b7ee8bc00cc5093d4986fbb2dc3d0c63ced74871)
Tests
- [x] Please add unit tests, this will become really important when the package matures
Added unit tests for all the functions. Now almost every line of code is being tested (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/9668f435f565cd5dbc557226cd02d75f2eaff1a3)
R code
- [x] Careful with some constructs that could go badly 2:length(score_lists)
Replaced this here (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/c21c7e0f799bc0ad67a45e64dc4ae5cc516caceb)
- [ ] You can use the R native pipe |>
I have tried to swap from %>%
to |>
but unfortunately it gets a bit complicated when I need the object not only in the first function parameter. To me this mtcars |> (\(.) plot(.$hp, .$mpg))()
becomes harder to read than mtcars %>% plot(hp,mpg)
. I would prefer to keep the code more readable but if you think I should change it to base R, I can try it again.
- [x] Functions would better do one task, so functions that have plotting outputs would be better separated and then return (rather than print ) the ggplot object. This is useful if you end up calling these functions many times and actually you would rather not generate plots but an object which you can plot at a later date.
I have separated fcs_processing()
into two functions and updated the vignette, NAMESPACE, and man files. (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/e758abd0acab82567f1fa31025587462583caa38)
Let me know if something else should be done. All your comments were very useful and definitely improved scifer
!
This looks good to me @rodrigarc, I dont think you need to make anymore changes. I'm going to double check the code and check the build on a windows laptop.
This looks good to me @rodrigarc, I dont think you need to make anymore changes. I'm going to double check the code and check the build on a windows laptop.
To make it easier for your review, I have also tested building in a windows computer. I had to first make sure that Rtools
and BiocStyle
were installed so it could be built without errors and warnings, I added that to the README (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/a2c9e4093faa00a7ab2f20f6e98a2b6e1f28f055). I changed a small detail on test-quality_report()
to avoid a note on a windows machine (https://github.com/rodrigarc/scifer/commit/de86678b6a7b681e002214c494b790cbd316786e).
Here are the results from R CMD CHECK
on a windows machine:
Sorry, I already did this and forgot to update to accept.
Your package has been accepted. It will be added to the Bioconductor nightly builds.
Thank you for contributing to Bioconductor!
Reviewers for Bioconductor packages are volunteers from the Bioconductor community. If you are interested in becoming a Bioconductor package reviewer, please see Reviewers Expectations.
Thank you again for reviewing it, @ococrook!
The master branch of your GitHub repository has been added to Bioconductor's git repository.
To use the git.bioconductor.org repository, we need an 'ssh' key to associate with your github user name. If your GitHub account already has ssh public keys (https://github.com/rodrigarc.keys is not empty), then no further steps are required. Otherwise, do the following:
See further instructions at
https://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/
for working with this repository. See especially
https://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/new-package-workflow/ https://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/sync-existing-repositories/
to keep your GitHub and Bioconductor repositories in sync.
Your package will be included in the next nigthly 'devel' build (check-out from git at about 6 pm Eastern; build completion around 2pm Eastern the next day) at
https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/
(Builds sometimes fail, so ensure that the date stamps on the main landing page are consistent with the addition of your package). Once the package builds successfully, you package will be available for download in the 'Devel' version of Bioconductor using BiocManager::install("scifer")
. The package 'landing page' will be created at
https://bioconductor.org/packages/scifer
If you have any questions, please contact the bioc-devel mailing list (https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel); this issue will not be monitored further.
Update the following URL to point to the GitHub repository of the package you wish to submit to Bioconductor
Confirm the following by editing each check box to '[x]'
[x] I understand that by submitting my package to Bioconductor, the package source and all review commentary are visible to the general public.
[x] I have read the Bioconductor Package Submission instructions. My package is consistent with the Bioconductor Package Guidelines.
[x] I understand Bioconductor Package Naming Policy and acknowledge Bioconductor may retain use of package name.
[x] I understand that a minimum requirement for package acceptance is to pass R CMD check and R CMD BiocCheck with no ERROR or WARNINGS. Passing these checks does not result in automatic acceptance. The package will then undergo a formal review and recommendations for acceptance regarding other Bioconductor standards will be addressed.
[x] My package addresses statistical or bioinformatic issues related to the analysis and comprehension of high throughput genomic data.
[x] I am committed to the long-term maintenance of my package. This includes monitoring the support site for issues that users may have, subscribing to the bioc-devel mailing list to stay aware of developments in the Bioconductor community, responding promptly to requests for updates from the Core team in response to changes in R or underlying software.
[x] I am familiar with the Bioconductor code of conduct and agree to abide by it.
I am familiar with the essential aspects of Bioconductor software management, including:
For questions/help about the submission process, including questions about the output of the automatic reports generated by the SPB (Single Package Builder), please use the #package-submission channel of our Community Slack. Follow the link on the home page of the Bioconductor website to sign up.