Closed vjcitn closed 7 years ago
(waits to see what the answer is, ponders patching this since VRanges has turned out to be very handy for capture sequencing results and clonality modeling)
--t
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Vince Carey notifications@github.com wrote:
VRanges can manage all the information on samples and calls, but the current function just acquires one record per variant. Is this function/package still in development?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Bioconductor/GoogleGenomics/issues/52, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAARIsvSsERgaEEjICUZPF232ua-Lvzmks5rTPlogaJpZM4Ll7zl .
Thanks Tim -- Let's be in touch before writing any code as there are some issues to think about regarding when to acquire the detailed data -- working directly with the JSON response or elaborating the current getVariants code ...
Hello Vince,
Thank you for your query. This package has not been updated in a while, mostly due to personal time considerations on my part, but we do intend to keep supporting it.
If you have a patch you would like me to review, I will be very grateful. Please read https://github.com/Bioconductor/GoogleGenomics/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst before you start working on the patch.
Else, I will be happy to work on your suggestion in my next set of updates.
This has been fixed by contributions from Vincent Carey and his team in pull requests #54 and #55. The changes are also available in the bioc-devel repository.
VRanges can manage all the information on samples and calls, but the current function just acquires one record per variant. Is this function/package still in development?