Closed ramonawalls closed 7 years ago
Added new terms for taxonomic association (bco:0000084), to taxon (bco:0000085), and of organism (bco:0000086).
Closed with 675f3ba .
A few fixes:
The relation bco:0000087 should be labeled 'member of taxon', and it should be a subproperty of 'member of'.
'Member of taxon' is a superproperty of the property chain: inverse ('of organism') o 'to taxon' This means that is an instance of identification assertion has of organism and to taxon relations specified to instances of organismal entity and Taxon, the instance of organismal entity will be inferred to be a member of the instance of Taxon.
@robgur and @jdeck88 - Can you please check if you agree with these changes.
Most up to date version of BCO is at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BiodiversityOntologies/bco/master/src/ontology/bco-edit.owl
I do think this makes sense, yes:
If an instance of identification assertion has 'of organism' and 'to taxon' relations specified to instances of 'organismal entity' and 'Taxon', the instance of organismal entity will be inferred to be a member of the instance of Taxon.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Ramona Walls notifications@github.com wrote:
@robgur https://github.com/robgur and @jdeck88 https://github.com/jdeck88 - Can you please check if you agree with these changes.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BiodiversityOntologies/bco/issues/78#issuecomment-266890809, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAcc7Dkmy3Gyt7auDxFRd5d3KcrfzZOmks5rHyS_gaJpZM4LJf8v .
looks good to me.
John
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Rob notifications@github.com wrote:
I do think this makes sense, yes:
If an instance of identification assertion has 'of organism' and 'to taxon' relations specified to instances of 'organismal entity' and 'Taxon', the instance of organismal entity will be inferred to be a member of the instance of Taxon.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Ramona Walls notifications@github.com wrote:
@robgur https://github.com/robgur and @jdeck88 https://github.com/jdeck88 - Can you please check if you agree with these changes.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BiodiversityOntologies/bco/issues/78#issuecomment- 266890809, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AAcc7Dkmy3Gyt7auDxFRd5d3KcrfzZOmks5rHyS_gaJpZM4LJf8v
.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BiodiversityOntologies/bco/issues/78#issuecomment-267024448, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGdxXRIjhSkPyDQ9dyWzhhgPaRJpi4aks5rH-RQgaJpZM4LJf8v .
-- John Deck (541) 914-4739
Had to make 'member of taxon' a subproperty of part of, not member of, because has member (inverse of member of) is irreflexsive and causes reasoning problems.
The ODP for this was devised at the PPO hackathon in Tucson in September 2016.
This will replace BCO:0000042.
TIP is a planned process that has as output a taxonomic association between a PCO:organismal entity and a DWC:taxon.