Open xiexiaowei opened 7 years ago
Hello,
sorry for the late reply.
?ggsurvplot
it says By default survdiff is used to calculate regular log-rank test.
The original code was also using logrank test.
Unfortunately I'm not expert with survival analysis, the orignal code was the same used in this paper . But just to know, how different they are? Also, maybe the surviminer maintainers might be able to answer better. Specially if the version differences was less than 7 months.
Codes:
devtools::install_github("BioinformaticsFMRP/TCGAbiolinks")
You can add a theme from ggthemes as follows:
clin <- GDCquery_clinic("TCGA-LGG", type = "clinical", save.csv = FALSE)
TCGAanalyze_survival(clin,
clusterCol="gender",
risk.table = FALSE,
conf.int = FALSE,
ggtheme = ggthemes::theme_few())
When did you run the previous analysis last year? In the middle of 2016, the TCGA dataset was reprocessed with different algorithms and a newer genome, hg38, and moved to the Genomic Data Commons. It's likely that you used data that was mapped to a different genome reference version (hg19) and was analysed with different algorithms (e.g. RSEM previously, HT-Seq currently) and it would therefore be expected that the survival results differ.
Hi, thanks for your great work! It seems that "TCGAbiolinks" has been updataed, or something is wrong with my system. I have three questions:
I'm looking forward to your reply! Thanks again very much!