Pantheon still can't count!!

[AdrianPKnowles]

I'm getting rather frustrated that Pantheon still has fundamental errors, like the inability to count. For a species list I have just entered the summary table says I have 18 Hemiptera. Clicking on the hyperlink for "18" is displays a list of 17 species.....

One wonders if the problem is Nysius huttoni, which appears in the "not analysed" list but is possibly being counted twice for some reason?

[Davydaveth]

No-one is really running on here as we could get no project funds. You are best running this sort of point via email at the moment. That said, does the taxonomic output page at the start of the analysis give the correct number of bugs? David

[AdrianPKnowles]

David

Thanks for your reply. The total number of Hemiptera in my list is 18. The “Results overview” table says 18 for the number analysed, but there are 17 species in that list when you click on the hyperlink, because the 18th species, Nysius huttoni, appears in the “not analysed” list. I think I’ve flagged up issues with N. huttoni before.

It is a pity that funding has dried up because I fear there are still several flaws in the data output that would lead the unwary user astray e.g. there were dozens of S41 Priority species that did not have that conservation value listed in the species list (although I think the correct SQI value may be being used in the SQI calculation).

Best wishes

Adrian

From: Davydaveth notifications@github.com Sent: 14 October 2020 10:05 To: BiologicalRecordsCentre/Pantheon Pantheon@noreply.github.com Cc: AdrianPKnowles adrian.knowles@dunelm.org.uk; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [BiologicalRecordsCentre/Pantheon] Pantheon still can't count!! (#258)

No-one is really running on here as we could get no project funds. You are best running this sort of point via email at the moment. That said, does the taxonomic output page at the start of the analysis give the correct number of bugs? David

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BiologicalRecordsCentre/Pantheon/issues/258#issuecomment-708266878 , or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKYDGEXPIBO2TVWDP2G4YNDSKVSUZANCNFSM4SQJEOGQ . https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AKYDGERVVUH5TIAN7TEFV73SKVSUZA5CNFSM4SQJEOG2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFI3UW7Q.gif

[Davydaveth]

I’m going to make a play for underspend this autumn, as without some decent funding it is hard to John to commit too much time to fix issues, let along increase analytical capacity. Useful to know how it differentially counts. Perhaps a note on that point might be useful as the distinction between analysed and non-analysed samples data is important.

We have an editing portal that can make, although not live, write changes to the database, so if you come across things you find send them over. We still have to wait for a database refresh for them to show though. Be safe David

Senior Entomologist Natural England Chief Scientist Directorate: Specialist Services & Programmes Natural England County Hall, Spetchley Road, Worcester WR5 2NP

Jabber Internal number 60947 (Worcester) Jabber external number 02080260947

From: AdrianPKnowles notifications@github.com Sent: 14 October 2020 13:36 To: BiologicalRecordsCentre/Pantheon Pantheon@noreply.github.com Cc: Heaver, David David.Heaver@naturalengland.org.uk; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [BiologicalRecordsCentre/Pantheon] Pantheon still can't count!! (#258)

David

Thanks for your reply. The total number of Hemiptera in my list is 18. The “Results overview” table says 18 for the number analysed, but there are 17 species in that list when you click on the hyperlink, because the 18th species, Nysius huttoni, appears in the “not analysed” list. I think I’ve flagged up issues with N. huttoni before.

It is a pity that funding has dried up because I fear there are still several flaws in the data output that would lead the unwary user astray e.g. there were dozens of S41 Priority species that did not have that conservation value listed in the species list (although I think the correct SQI value may be being used in the SQI calculation).

Best wishes

Adrian

From: Davydaveth notifications@github.com Sent: 14 October 2020 10:05 To: BiologicalRecordsCentre/Pantheon Pantheon@noreply.github.com Cc: AdrianPKnowles adrian.knowles@dunelm.org.uk; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [BiologicalRecordsCentre/Pantheon] Pantheon still can't count!! (#258)

No-one is really running on here as we could get no project funds. You are best running this sort of point via email at the moment. That said, does the taxonomic output page at the start of the analysis give the correct number of bugs? David

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BiologicalRecordsCentre/Pantheon/issues/258#issuecomment-708266878 , or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKYDGEXPIBO2TVWDP2G4YNDSKVSUZANCNFSM4SQJEOGQ . https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AKYDGERVVUH5TIAN7TEFV73SKVSUZA5CNFSM4SQJEOG2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFI3UW7Q.gif

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FBiologicalRecordsCentre%2FPantheon%2Fissues%2F258%23issuecomment-708372046&data=04%7C01%7Cdavid.heaver%40naturalengland.org.uk%7C8d37f9e5d3034f42adee08d8703daa5c%7C770a245002274c6290c74e38537f1102%7C1%7C0%7C637382757435166061%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=OpjTN01Ano%2BSAC6lCwQ3dVNPtUVxesbIpo5SSNX3iJA%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAK2BWRC2IKANZGV5QFRZX6LSKWLJ3ANCNFSM4SQJEOGQ&data=04%7C01%7Cdavid.heaver%40naturalengland.org.uk%7C8d37f9e5d3034f42adee08d8703daa5c%7C770a245002274c6290c74e38537f1102%7C1%7C0%7C637382757435176015%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=0ecuukGhz61epsQHsSZJZOqdgJ3E9NMO1ICxfdfitno%3D&reserved=0.

This email and any attachments is intended for the named recipient only. If you have received it in error you have no authority to use, disclose, store or copy any of its contents and you should destroy it and inform the sender. Whilst this email and associated attachments will have been checked for known viruses whilst within the Natural England systems, we can accept no responsibility once it has left our systems. Communications on Natural England systems may be monitored and/or recorded to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes.