search

BiologicalRecordsCentre / bsbi-atlas-drupal8

0 stars 0 forks source link

Cotula sessilis (Soliva pteropserma) caption missing #26

Closed kwal2 closed 1 month ago

kwal2 commented 5 months ago

We have maps, phenology, alts for this but the caption is missing

burkmarr commented 5 months ago

Relevant comments from emails (to keep all info in one place:

@japonicus: "Do you know whether caption text for Cotula sessilis was ever written and has got lost? There is no caption for this (or its synonyms) in the DDb."

@kwal2: "I can't remember writing the caption for Soliva although I remember editing Capsella rubra to take account of Colin Pope and Paul Stanley's article in BSBI News that first alerted us to the presence of Cotula sessilis on Caravan sites. I'm happy to write a caption for it as it has similarities with C. alpina that I have worked on so shouldn't take too long but just checking we're all happy for this to be uploaded it if I did that?"

kwal2 commented 4 months ago

I've now written the account for Cotula sessilis on the DDb so it can be imported to the website when me make changes

sacrevert commented 4 months ago

@japonicus & @kwal2 to arrange export of update to @burkmarr

sacrevert commented 4 months ago

@burkmarr Do you think we should just be closing these once they are confirmed as updated in DDb? This one seems like it could be closed on that basis

burkmarr commented 4 months ago

@sacrevert - I suggest we leave them open until I have a caption update from the DDB, then I go through them and close them once I confirm they have been addressed.

sacrevert commented 4 months ago

@burkmarr I was thinking of creating a general issue relating to the overall process of providing you with the update. We also need to catalogue to changes for an errata, so, I was thinking that we can just looked back at closed issues for that (assuming that all changes are catalogued here). Thoughts @kwal2 @japonicus ?

sacrevert commented 1 month ago

I must have forgotten this discussion, as I have been leaving issues open that affect book (for errata) and closing those that only affect website (on assumption that they would be automatically fixed on production of a new export). Given that's what I've been doing, I suggest we close this.