Closed michalshap closed 2 years ago
That's a good point. Behind the scenes both directions are calculated at once which is why the matching_mode
keyword does not stop the error from occurring. I think a valid behavior would be to reduce the number of neighbors for the problematic direction and then calculate both directions, and to issue a warning so that the user knows that one direction is not actually using the desired number of neighbors. I'll open a PR addressing this shortly.
Changes are now available in version 0.9.0 https://github.com/IBM/causallib/releases/tag/v0.9.0
Hello,
If I have 10 examples in my "treated" group and 1000 in the "control" group, Is it possible to do one-side matching (match control to treatment) of more than 10 neighbors (e.g. 50)?
I tried using the "matching_mode" argument in causallib.estimation.Matching for one-directional matching, but still got the error "Expected n_neighbors <= n_samples" when using matcher.match.
Thank you!