NSFW Links aren't really well organized (Website)

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. It's on the website
2. Some sites are NSFW but not listed as.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
--

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Latest Grabber - Windows 8.1 - 64Bits

Please provide any additional information below if necessary.
Sorry if that doesn't really count, but I started to download some images from 
those 3 sites: behoimi.com / safebooru.org / yande.re, which in the site said 
that they're all safe. However, I've checked the files and there are some 
explicit images, which I don't want in my computer.

(The tag I downloaded was "sailor_mercury")

I do also think that Konachan is explicit, you can even activate in the website 
for safe mode, but I think for downloading will download any picture, explicit 
and safe.

Please also attach the log file if possible.
No log file because this is a problem on the website.

I'm sorry, but I don't like those type of pictures and I may need to redownload 
everything again, the only site that I know that is safe is Safebooru (hence 
the name).

Original issue reported on code.google.com by gabrielw...@gmail.com on 25 Feb 2014 at 9:38

[GoogleCodeExporter]

(I just take a search and it seems that yande.re is NSFW)

Original comment by gabrielw...@gmail.com on 25 Feb 2014 at 9:40

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hello,

Yes, yande.re is indeed a totally NSFW 18+ website. However, safebooru.org is 
totally safe and behoimi.com only has questionable images (light clothed 
girls), nothing hardcore.
If you are looking for totally safe images, you should add "rating:safe" in 
your searches on Danbooru-based boards (Gelbooru-boards support it too). This 
way only safe images should be shown, even on "NSFW"-marked boards.

I will update the info on the website and set yande.re as NSFW, as it should be.

Original comment by bio.nus@hotmail.fr on 25 Feb 2014 at 10:07

• Changed state: Done
• Added labels: Type-Other
• Removed labels: Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Does Grabber supports "rating:safe" tags?

So I would put every source and put "rating:safe" tag along with I want.

I does support, how do I download 2 tags at once?

Thanks for editing the home page as well.

Original comment by gabrielw...@gmail.com on 25 Feb 2014 at 10:12

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I meant "If does support..."

Original comment by gabrielw...@gmail.com on 25 Feb 2014 at 10:14

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Putting every source is not a good idea, you should stick with only Danbooru 
and Gelbooru-based boards. Shimmie and others don't support it.

You can of course put two tags in your search. For example "sailor_mercury 
rating:safe". Just use a space as a separator. There should be some brownish 
auto-completion and coloring for it.

http://donmai.us/wiki_pages/43049 (this is for danbooru, gelbooru supports less)

Original comment by bio.nus@hotmail.fr on 25 Feb 2014 at 10:21

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Ok thanks for telling me.

How strict are Questionable images?

Do you know what boorus support the rating:safe?

Safebooru (Y)
Danbooru (Y)
Derpbooru (?)
Gelbooru (X)
rule34.booru (?)

And does konachan works? If doesn't, it's not a problem, I can log in and get 
picture by picture, using the Safe Mode website.

Thanks for your help.

Original comment by gabrielw...@gmail.com on 25 Feb 2014 at 10:35

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Safebooru -> yes, danbooru-based
Danbooru -> yes, danbooru-based
Derpbooru -> no
Gelbooru -> yes, gelbooru-based
rule34.booru -> theorically yes, but I don't advice you to use this source if 
you're looking for safe for work pictures, as the website itself is kind of 
NSFW by nature. You might not consider "safe" what they say is "safe" (because 
there is technically no nudity or whatever)

Actually, in the "Sources" window, you should see a little icon and/or text 
(depending on your settings) besides the URL: those saying "danbooru" (brown 3D 
square) or gelbooru (blue G) support the "rating:safe" tag.

Konachan also works with "rating:safe". Actually, their 18- safe version might 
just add the "rating:safe" tag automatically.

Original comment by bio.nus@hotmail.fr on 25 Feb 2014 at 10:44

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Oh, I forgot your other question.

Questionable images may contain:
    Cameltoes and wedgies.
    Apparent erect nipples.
    Sexually suggestive acts (sucking suggestively on hotdogs, etc).
    Exposed areolae, nipples, or breasts.
    Erections under clothes, sex toys not being used, toys hinted at or hidden under clothes.
    Mild sexual content (ear biting, breast grabbing, saliva-swapping, etc).
    Pubic hair (while the rest of the genitals remain hidden), non-blatantly exposed genitals, full frontal nudity without additional "action" or bodily fluids.
    Implied and hinted at sexual acts.
    Actual intercourse, if portrayed in a restrained and tasteful manner (this can be tricky and is necessarily a judgement call, but if it concentrates on the act and omits anatomical details, it's likely okay)
    Implied or obscured bodily fluids (someone sitting on the toilet, somewhat wet panties, etc. Again, this is a judgement call)
    Bondage, spanking and more general BDSM activities without insertion or bodily fluids.
    Other assorted erotica, as long as it doesn't cross the porn line. While rather hard to define precisely, the basic test is that of intent -- does it show just to show sex, or is it rather as a part of some other, normal human activity?

More info here: http://www.donmai.us/wiki_pages/10920

Original comment by bio.nus@hotmail.fr on 25 Feb 2014 at 10:47

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thanks for the about the #7 post.

Ok about the questionable, so the questionable does also show nude (which I 
don't want). Anything with clothes is what I'm looking for (with some 
exceptions).

Does questionable images contain safe as well? They're in clothes but still 
have some explicit content. Like "rating:safe rating:questionable"?

I have an image that a friend of mine got for me (in Sankaku Complex) that is 
questionable, that just shows the girl lifting her skirt and showing her 
panties. Her name is Irisu Kyouko, I don't really have the link, since he 
packed up in a zip.

Original comment by gabrielw...@gmail.com on 25 Feb 2014 at 11:53

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Questionable contains few full nudity, and even less exposed genitals. If you 
want absolutely zero nudity, you could use the "-nude" tag (which means "no 
nude"). But you would still find partially nude images. Questionable is between 
"safe" and "porn", so I don't think you can extract a specific set out of it. 
Many questionable images have full clothes but depict sexual behavior or 
situations. I find the name, "questionable", very well found, as it's very hard 
to define it.

For your other question, "rating:questionable" does not contain "rating:safe". 
You can look for both at the same time using "-rating:explicit" (posts that are 
not explicit, therefore either safe or questionable).

If you are talking about this image: 
http://danbooru.donmai.us/data/e5523362597b93576a6f60924d530aad.jpg then yeah 
it is considered questionable as it isn't a "innocent" behavior.
I think you could filter non-nude images out of questionable images using stuff 
like "-nude -topless -bottomless -rating:explicit" but you could still find 
wrong results, and danbooru has a 2 tags limit (other boorus don't have it).

Original comment by bio.nus@hotmail.fr on 26 Feb 2014 at 12:11

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thank you for your comment. Yes, I do agree that tags aren't 100% accurate. 
I'll see what I'll do, maybe I do those websites but only with rating:safe (the 
ones that support).

Yes, that was the picture (I'm kinda surprised that you already have found) 
[maybe it's because the minority of pictures of her]. 

I have another question. I think the Yande.re has a safe mode, I once logged in 
(after registration), and I haven't saw any pictures that are explicit. I think 
I turned on "safe mode" after I registered, it has been some years so I don't 
remember.

Thanks

Original comment by gabrielw...@gmail.com on 26 Feb 2014 at 1:34