port to m5stack core and wt32-sc01, wt32-sc01-plus

[valerio-vaccaro]

m5stack core based nerdmner reusing the graphics of the first han solominer

[valerio-vaccaro]

Environment	Status	Duration
M5Stick-C	SUCCESS	00:01:35.896
ESP32-S3-mini-wemos	SUCCESS	00:01:11.620
han_m5stack	SUCCESS	00:00:50.806
ESP32-S3-mini-weact	SUCCESS	00:00:53.631
ESP32-S3-devKitv1	SUCCESS	00:00:46.520
NerminerV2	SUCCESS	00:00:51.208
ESP32-devKitv1	SUCCESS	00:00:49.333
NerminerV2-S3-AMOLED	SUCCESS	00:01:09.167
NerminerV2-S3-DONGLE	SUCCESS	00:01:01.013
esp32cam	SUCCESS	00:01:02.484
NerminerV2-T-QT	SUCCESS	00:01:05.454
ESP32-2432S028R	SUCCESS	00:01:09.106
NerdminerV2-T-Display_V1	SUCCESS	00:01:07.042
M5-StampS3	SUCCESS	00:01:12.415

[julio-matarranz]

Sorry to ask but why mixing Han solo miner and Nerdminer in the same projet ?

[valerio-vaccaro]

Added support for wt32-sc01 and wt32-sc01-plus.

Environment	Status	Duration
M5Stick-C	SUCCESS	00:00:54.961
wt32-sc01	SUCCESS	00:01:48.148
wt32-sc01-plus	SUCCESS	00:01:38.173
ESP32-S3-mini-wemos	SUCCESS	00:00:59.252
han_m5stack	SUCCESS	00:01:00.339
ESP32-S3-mini-weact	SUCCESS	00:01:02.783
ESP32-S3-devKitv1	SUCCESS	00:01:00.503
NerminerV2	SUCCESS	00:01:01.958
ESP32-devKitv1	SUCCESS	00:00:56.249
NerminerV2-S3-AMOLED	SUCCESS	00:01:06.481
NerminerV2-S3-DONGLE	SUCCESS	00:00:52.664
esp32cam	SUCCESS	00:00:48.005
NerminerV2-T-QT	SUCCESS	00:00:59.300
ESP32-2432S028R	SUCCESS	00:01:02.000
NerdminerV2-T-Display_V1	SUCCESS	00:00:57.819
M5-StampS3	SUCCESS	00:00:46.805

[valerio-vaccaro]

Sorry to ask but why mixing Han solo miner and Nerdminer in the same projet ?

Nerdminer was based on hansolominer code, I personally avoid forks in project, if 90% of code is similar why forking a codebase.

When @BitMaker-hub decided to fork it behaved in a strange way compared to the open source world (among other things repeated for the flasher, as you can see the fork still lacks the ERASE functionality).

I think it is better to collaborate on the same repository.

I didn't ask for anything other than making my proposals to support more cards.

I'm quite disappointed by the fork proposals but if it has to be like this I'm ready.

[julio-matarranz]

Sorry to ask but why mixing Han solo miner and Nerdminer in the same projet ?

Nerdminer was based on hansolominer code, I personally avoid forks in project, if 90% of code is similar why forking a codebase.

When @BitMaker-hub decided to fork it behaved in a strange way compared to the open source world (among other things repeated for the flasher, as you can see the fork still lacks the ERASE functionality).

I think it is better to collaborate on the same repository.

I didn't ask for anything other than making my proposals to support more cards.

I'm quite disappointed by the fork proposals but if it has to be like this I'm ready.

Thank you for your answer I understand your point and I think there is a commercial reason about the name... The fork with rename could have been avoided for sure.

[BitMaker-hub]

I fully agree with adding these cards and have no issue with them using the HANminer interface.

From the beginning, I have maintained that NerdMiner was based on Valerio's project, and I've tried to respect it fully. I've sought advice and aimed to be as respectful as possible in this regard. My intention was never otherwise, and I've been learning to work and collaborate in other repositories during this time. If I forked at the start instead of making a pull request (PR), it wasn't by my own choice at that time, but due to a lack of understanding of how the tools worked.

On my part, there was also no commercial intention; I always wanted to learn with this project and for people to like and know about it. The project's growth was driven purely by a passion for improvement and learning, which led me to invest so many hours into it and later, upon seeing others "commercialize" it, to do the same. If I have offended anyone, I apologize.