GBKS
commented
1 week ago Yes, this is something we have discussed before. These minor issues were in the original SVG symbol that was first proposed in 2010. Some argue we should just keep them as a historic artifact of sorts, others don't care. What do you make of this?
Describe the bug The bitcoin-symbol.svg has two issues in the svg. See images below:
This can be fixed with the following svg:
<svg width="144" height="144" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g clip-path="url(#a)"><path d="M144 72c0-39.764-32.235-72-72-72C32.236 0 0 32.236 0 72c0 39.765 32.236 72 72 72 39.765 0 72-32.235 72-72Z" fill="#F7931A"/><path d="m49.738 34.218-2.101 8.442s5.863 1.341 5.742 1.431c3.2.797 3.78 2.92 3.68 4.59l-8.864 35.55c-.387.968-1.386 2.43-3.618 1.877.08.112-5.738-1.427-5.738-1.427l-3.92 9.036c3.87.963 12.191 3.033 15.908 4.023l-3.267 13.131 7.889 1.967 3.24-12.987c2.16.576 4.248 1.116 6.3 1.629l-3.231 12.928 7.902 1.971 3.267-13.099c13.473 2.547 23.602 1.521 27.873-10.661 3.438-9.81-.171-15.471-7.263-19.161 5.161-1.188 9.049-4.59 10.093-11.601 1.427-9.576-5.863-14.728-15.84-18.166l3.24-12.983-7.902-1.966-3.15 12.635a293.112 293.112 0 0 0-6.331-1.485l3.172-12.721-7.888-1.971-3.24 12.978-15.93-3.947-.023-.013Zm35.83 52.942c-2.44 9.81-18.96 4.51-24.319 3.178l4.338-17.388c5.355 1.34 22.532 3.977 19.98 14.21ZM88.01 61.71c-2.232 8.918-15.975 4.391-20.43 3.284l3.928-15.772c4.46 1.107 18.82 3.186 16.502 12.488Z" fill="#fff"/></g><defs><clipPath id="a"><path fill="#fff" d="M0 0h144v144H0z"/></clipPath></defs></svg>I think it would be nice if the bitcoindesign guide website has a good source of truth for the bitcoin logo.