BitcoinDesign / Guide

A free, open-source community resource for designers, developers and others working on non-custodial bitcoin products.
https://bitcoin.design/guide/
Other
455 stars 98 forks source link

Provide design guidance for purchasing bitcoin within the wallet #989

Open moneyball opened 1 year ago

moneyball commented 1 year ago

Some wallets will integrate buying bitcoin into the wallet itself. The design guide currently assumes a wallet user will transfer from an exchange: https://bitcoin.design/guide/daily-spending-wallet/first-use/#initial-deposit

It would be nice to offer UI guidance for purchasing within the wallet itself, including addressing:

  1. How to handle selection from multiple entities to buy from
  2. How to display relevant information about each (some kind of brand/trust, costs, etc.)
moneyball commented 1 year ago

Related: "The Customer Experience" https://wallet.build/helping-customers-move-between-fiat-and-bitcoin-how-well-build-with-partners-to-bring-more-people-to-self-custody

GBKS commented 1 year ago

Came across this video from Keeper about buying directly to cold storage. Something to consider for this task (also the UX details like the user having to refresh the transactions screen a few times after making the purchase - should ideally auto-update).

GBKS commented 1 year ago

"Fiat over lightning" is another layer to consider. During onboarding, a user might need to interact with an exchange (which could also be P2P like Peach). Later they may want to buy bitcoin via some sort of lightning-based stablecoin. That would be more of a "native swap" rather than a third-party integration.

steynviljoen67 commented 1 year ago

@GBKS you can assign me to this task. Happy to look at it as well.

GBKS commented 1 year ago

Awesome, thanks @steynviljoen67. I just assigned it to you.

siyanbolagiggs commented 1 year ago

@GBKS I'll be glad to help on this, i'm kinda new to this platform so i might need a little help on where i can provide my ideas.

steynviljoen67 commented 1 year ago

Hi Siyanbola, I’ve started to do some work on this and plan to go through some of the progress on Monday during our jam session. It would be great if you can join.

On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 at 18:11, Siyanbola Khalid @.***> wrote:

@GBKS https://github.com/GBKS I'll be glad to help on this, i'm kinda new to this platform so i might need a little help on where i can provide my ideas.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BitcoinDesign/Guide/issues/989#issuecomment-1500923397, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZ5MPIFGX6NITMYY2VWEDPTXAGE4FANCNFSM6AAAAAAVK6JVVA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

siyanbolagiggs commented 1 year ago
Sure buddy, you are making progress I reckon.I’ll be glad to review and help in anyway I can Sent from Mail for Windows From: SteynSent: 08 April 2023 17:23To: BitcoinDesign/GuideCc: Siyanbola Khalid; CommentSubject: Re: [BitcoinDesign/Guide] Provide design guidance for purchasing bitcoin within the wallet (Issue #989) Hi Siyanbola, I’ve started to do some work on this and plan to go throughsome of the progress on Monday during our jam session. It would be great ifyou can join.On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 at 18:11, Siyanbola Khalid ***@***.***>wrote:> @GBKS I'll be glad to help on this, i'm kinda> new to this platform so i might need a little help on where i can provide> my ideas.>> —> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub> ,> or unsubscribe> > .> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:> ***@***.***>>—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>  Website Unilorin Bulletin Undergrad Portal Postgrad Portal
yashrajd commented 1 year ago

Hi @steynviljoen67 where can I find the doc you're using to explore this?

yashrajd commented 1 year ago

Related: "The Customer Experience" https://wallet.build/helping-customers-move-between-fiat-and-bitcoin-how-well-build-with-partners-to-bring-more-people-to-self-custody

Looked closer at the user flow example presented here, it's a nice starting point.

  1. Noticed it uses the payment method is a filter. It's is possible a user may want to choose it at a later time if, say a provider with lowest fees (or KYC requirements) only accepts certain payment modes. If there's a lot of providers in the future, the second screen could be used to present filter options.

It might be possible to present recommendations based on specific criteria.

  1. For relevant information, we could use labels as filterable, sortable tags. Eg of filter: KYC, eg. of sorting: BTC rate or fee %

Created crude mockup. Thoughts?

IMG_5589

Thoughts? What else should we be thinking about?

steynviljoen67 commented 1 year ago

Hi @steynviljoen67 where can I find the doc you're using to explore this?

Here are some rough notes: https://www.craft.do/s/2zQfLmlifu8JBE

steynviljoen67 commented 1 year ago

Related: "The Customer Experience" https://wallet.build/helping-customers-move-between-fiat-and-bitcoin-how-well-build-with-partners-to-bring-more-people-to-self-custody

Looked closer at the user flow example presented here, it's a nice starting point.

  1. Noticed it uses the payment method is a filter. It's is possible a user may want to choose it at a later time if, say a provider with lowest fees (or KYC requirements) only accepts certain payment modes. If there's a lot of providers in the future, the second screen could be used to present filter options.

It might be possible to present recommendations based on specific criteria.

  1. For relevant information, we could use labels as filterable, sortable tags. Eg of filter: KYC, eg. of sorting: BTC rate or fee %

Created crude mockup. Thoughts?

IMG_5589

Thoughts? What else should we be thinking about?

This list of possible things from wallet.build (now bitkey.build), is a great guideline:

Multiple filters are great if you have a lot of providers but I suspect that in most cases, a wallet will only list a handful of payment providers.

Segmenting the providers might be more accessible. Either way, we can explore all these options a bit more.

mouxdesign commented 1 year ago

@steynviljoen67 we chatted a bit and shared this write up during the call. Some of the questions from Yashraj and Stephen were:

Hope this is helpful in the write up and great job so far exploring this.

steynviljoen67 commented 1 year ago

Thanks for the questions.

I think finding the right providers is quite important to make the onramp as accessible and inclusive as possible. This is worth noting, but ultimately it's up to the wallet developer to decide on this.

As for KYC, to my knowledge, this is handled by the onramp providers.

mouxdesign commented 1 year ago

Chatted with Steyn and we moved the current content for this write up into a google doc so that its open for commenting and suggestions.

Link to Google doc

Link to Figma file with screenshot research images done by Steyn.