This is low priority that I hesitate to bring up, but this statement "The filesystem for each of those partitions must be defined. Ext4 is the default choice since it's the most recent." I can't decide whether it would be better to say "Ext4 is the default choice since it is the stable, well-tested successor to Ext3" or just delete "since it's the most recent". Btrfs, the default of SUSE linux, came out in 2007, a year after Ext4, in addition others. And, as well as not being accurate, it sounds really lame! Surely it's better to not say anything than give this out this poor excuse for providing it as the default.
I'll check back and I'm leaning toward deleting the short phrase because I hate to presume the reason when I have no knowledge of actual decision-making process. (or if there even was a decision as opposed to just doing whatever others have done with Arch, etc.)
This is low priority that I hesitate to bring up, but this statement "The filesystem for each of those partitions must be defined. Ext4 is the default choice since it's the most recent." I can't decide whether it would be better to say "Ext4 is the default choice since it is the stable, well-tested successor to Ext3" or just delete "since it's the most recent". Btrfs, the default of SUSE linux, came out in 2007, a year after Ext4, in addition others. And, as well as not being accurate, it sounds really lame! Surely it's better to not say anything than give this out this poor excuse for providing it as the default. I'll check back and I'm leaning toward deleting the short phrase because I hate to presume the reason when I have no knowledge of actual decision-making process. (or if there even was a decision as opposed to just doing whatever others have done with Arch, etc.)