Closed lachlanhardy closed 2 months ago
there is almost always a “correct” answer, but applying that answer to your specific situation will always be nuanced and messy. Further, the correct answer is often different depending on whether you’re taking a short-term or long-term perspective.
There is always another layer of context that validates or invalidates any given piece of work. This is why operating from a place of curiosity is so powerful: folks who appear to be doing something nonsensical almost always have more information than you, or are missing a key piece of information that you have.
As an executive, each time this happens is a reminder to share your context more widely and remain curious. You’ll rarely be missing strategic context but you’ll increasingly be missing the tactical context around how things actually work.
RICE: Simple prioritization for product managers
Great communication includes meetings but requires strong individual relationships and working through many other channels (e.g., email, chat), but all of these are easier to create on top of effective meetings.
When you get a question from an executive, focus on understanding the insight or perspective within the question. Then confirm that insight with the executive explicitly.
Test before broadcasting
Book: The Engineering Executive's Primer by Will Larson
Aiming to read:
Chapters:
MC: @lachlanhardy Notes: @mcgain
See you all at 12pm AEDT, July 31 @ https://blackmill.whereby.com/bookclub
As always, if you'd like a calendar invite and/or access to Slack beforehand, get in touch via gday@blackmill.co.