@jshorish So right now, are we using the same m that is also supposed to be used in the general interarrival time? I think I am partially confused on that. For now I am going to design this as a constant number of timesteps delay, but this can easily be adapted in the future so that given an m value, a t is computed, and that is used in place of the constant value.
The reason I am not sure if the same m makes sense, is if we are in a case where m = .1 for inerarrival time like in the sweep, then we are pretty much always going to end up with 0 delay. But I might be misunderstanding so please let me know if so.
This point goes likewise for the distortion signal, I may make a separate issue for later modifying these functions once I clarify the way it should be
@jshorish So right now, are we using the same m that is also supposed to be used in the general interarrival time? I think I am partially confused on that. For now I am going to design this as a constant number of timesteps delay, but this can easily be adapted in the future so that given an m value, a t is computed, and that is used in place of the constant value.
The reason I am not sure if the same m makes sense, is if we are in a case where m = .1 for inerarrival time like in the sweep, then we are pretty much always going to end up with 0 delay. But I might be misunderstanding so please let me know if so.