Open anilbey opened 7 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 89.06250%
with 7 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 73.29%. Comparing base (
b5fc0e5
) to head (0b3eb99
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
bluepyefe/cell.py | 90.90% | 2 Missing :warning: |
bluepyefe/rheobase.py | 77.77% | 2 Missing :warning: |
tests/test_efel_settings.py | 66.66% | 2 Missing :warning: |
bluepyefe/extract.py | 66.66% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Thanks @anilbey ! I think we should test this with all the readers: ibw, different types of nwb, abf, etc. with a good number of ephys files to see if it works and if it improves the performance. e.g. for ibw files this bluepyemodel example would be a sufficient test.
With this change the
Cell
object calls therecording.compute_efeatures
in parallel in theextract_efeatures
function.