Closed arnaudon closed 1 year ago
And for this flag. At the moment is not really working as expected. extra_value_errors should crash the code (but that was commented out). When extra_value_errors is false, we could ignore the rows and show a warning (that we're ignoring the row).
something like that?
The test breaks because the test run has None in extra_values, and the df is then empty, so it does not seem to save it, and thus a mismatch. Not sure how to make the extra_values not None in the tests.
@arnaudon , may be we should try to complete that , no ? since it seems you made 90% of the work already :)
Ah, as you wish, I'm not using BluePyEMM anymore.
It is more like I would prefer that problem not to happen anymore. If we are not going to use bluepymm anymore that is fine though. Let's see what @wvangeit thinks about that.
Discussed this with @arnaudon this morning. He actually meant he's not using bluepymm atm. But e.g. for sscx it would be good to have this solved.
Solving https://github.com/BlueBrain/BluePyMM/issues/222
There is already a flag to bypass this filtering, so I just did the simplest modif.