Closed adrien-berchet closed 3 years ago
I can't call for a reviewer on this repository. @asanin-epfl could you either review it or call for another reviewer plz?
Hi @adrien-berchet why do you want to incorporate this behaviour? How much it will lighten you code in terms of lines? For now, I see missing docstring updates, tests and general documentation misses the new flag. In general we try to minimize the base code of libraries.
In my case I just use it as a loader but I don't need the cache (I read the morphologies only once). I use it to define the loader in a quite global scope and then I can just get the morphology I need with 1 line. But since I need a mutable morphology, it takes 2 lines just to get the morphology and the 2nd line (morpho.as_mutable()
) is not relevant in the context of loading a morphology, so I have to define another function to hide these 2 lines. So I think that this feature could be usefull for other users of the library.
But of course, if you think it is not relevant it is ok. If you think it is I will update the PR to fix missing docstring.
In my case I just use it as a loader but I don't need the cache (I read the morphologies only once)
Do you use cache_size = 0
to avoid using cache?
if you think it is not relevant it is ok
I'm sorry but I can't find such change to be relevant.
ok then, np
Context
The morphologies returned by
MorphLoader
are not mutable, so we have to callmorph.as_mutable()
to make it mutable before updating it. This PR allows to get mutable morphologies from MorphLoader.Resolution
The
MorphLoader
constructor has a new parameter to choose whether the returned morphologies should be mutable or not.