Closed alkino closed 2 months ago
We need to check that it can still compile a MOD file containing a KINETIC block. The suspicion is that a KINETIC block will ask for sympy even if the subcommand sympy
wasn't requested.
The other question is if we can do away with the initialization code entirely. I think there's a singleton that represents "access to Python". Maybe we can initialize the singleton properly when we first use it (and no sooner).
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #205973 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here!
Status and direct links:
Attention: Patch coverage is 5.26316%
with 18 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 86.50%. Comparing base (
b78c3f3
) to head (bef0df9
).:exclamation: Current head bef0df9 differs from pull request most recent head 081ac76. Consider uploading reports for the commit 081ac76 to get more accurate results
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/main.cpp | 5.26% | 18 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #206012 (:no_entry:) have been uploaded here!
Status and direct links:
I tried to find places where the embedded Python is used, but I only found the Sympy related stuff. Then I check if Sympy is used within a different visitor; but didn't find anything.
Therefore, this looks correct to me.
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #205487 (:no_entry:) have been uploaded here!
Status and direct links: