Closed sixtyfourktec closed 1 month ago
I can't remember why we decided not to substitute this. It's also not mentioned in the PR :thinking: @jkloetzke can you remember?
As I also have this use-case and don't see a good reason against I think this could be supported.
IIRC we thought that it's not necessary because the meta environment should describe static properties of the recipe/package. Apparently this assumption simply does not hold. So I guess we should just add the substitution support and let it behave like privateEnvironment
.
Something like this is not possible right now:
If we have generic recipes which e.g. get the version number to be used passed in, it would be nice if this is also reflected in the PKG_VERSION. I guess this would be the main place someone would like to look at for this kind of information.