Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
The changes to delay(..) function is not good for me, it seems that we lose the
microsecond precision, a call like delay(5) could give a 5.001ms or 5.999ms
delay with the same probability (in average you get a 5.500ms delay with a 10%
skew).
Am I wrong?
old one:
void delay(unsigned long ms) {
uint16_t start = (uint16_t)micros();
while (ms > 0) {
if (((uint16_t)micros() - start) >= 1000) {
ms--;
start += 1000;
}
}
}
mspr proposal:
void delay(unsigned long ms) {
unsigned long start = millis();
while (millis() - start <= ms)
;
}
Original comment by c.mag...@bug.st
on 5 Oct 2010 at 6:20
I don't think that's an intentional change. Rather Mark probably grabbed
wiring.c before the delay() function was updated to be more accurate. You
should probably diff against a previous version of wiring.c, or maybe Mark can
submit a patch?
Original comment by dmel...@gmail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 6:33
I have to go through all of my updates and apply them to the latest (0021)
code. I will pay attention to these comments and make sure I do not change the
function or timing of the code.
Mark
Original comment by mark.l.s...@gmail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 6:36
Mark I've already seen all your patches belonging to issues:
http://code.google.com/p/arduino/issues/detail?id=340
http://code.google.com/p/arduino/issues/detail?id=324
http://code.google.com/p/arduino/issues/detail?id=343
http://code.google.com/p/arduino/issues/detail?id=316
http://code.google.com/p/arduino/issues/detail?id=315
http://code.google.com/p/arduino/issues/detail?id=307
and applied in this github branch:
merged your github tree -
http://github.com/cmaglie/Arduino/commit/5fa0b4415e9f4dc5d899bad0da89ad6b48ec76a
8
applied remaining patches -
http://github.com/cmaglie/Arduino/commit/c5b85b328eab35382aedbb0529099473bd70ab0
5
I changed a little bit your source code formatting, to reduce diffs size.
Can you check if I missed something?
tnx
C.
Original comment by c.mag...@bug.st
on 5 Oct 2010 at 6:52
http://github.com/arduino/Arduino/commit/b0bc52d7d5bd92d35ba78619d9268cd574ffca9
4
Original comment by dmel...@gmail.com
on 17 Oct 2010 at 9:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mark.l.s...@gmail.com
on 13 Aug 2010 at 6:26Attachments: