Open rainoftime opened 4 years ago
Hi, for the following formula
(set-logic BV) (declare-const bv_47-0 (_ BitVec 47)) (assert (forall ((q20 (_ BitVec 10)) (q21 (_ BitVec 10)) (q22 (_ BitVec 10)) (q23 (_ BitVec 47)) (q24 (_ BitVec 47)) (q25 (_ BitVec 9))) (=> (= q24 q23 bv_47-0 bv_47-0 bv_47-0) ( bvult q25 (_ bv268 9))))) (check-sat)
boolector 6fce0ac35ec yields sat, but both cvc4 and z3 return unsat
sat
unsat
This formula seems trivially unsat because q25 only appears once in the body.
Another one
(set-logic BV) (declare-fun _substvar_10_ () (_ BitVec 8)) (assert (forall ((q8 (_ BitVec 8)) (q9 (_ BitVec 8)) (q10 (_ BitVec 7))) (=> (= q9 _substvar_10_ q9 q8 q8) (= (_ bv0 7) q10 (_ bv0 7))))) (check-sat)
@aniemetz This issue seems to be related to miniscoping. With the option --quant-ms=0, boolector can return unsat. Could you have a check?
--quant-ms=0
Boolector is not actively maintained and developed anymore. It was succeeded by Bitwuzla and the repository is now archived.
Hi, for the following formula
boolector 6fce0ac35ec yields
sat
, but both cvc4 and z3 returnunsat
This formula seems trivially
unsat
because q25 only appears once in the body.Another one