I have a quantified formula (in the attachment formula.zip) for which Boolector 3.0.1-pre returns sat. I think that this result might be incorrect, as Z3 (4.8.5), CVC4 (1.6), and Q3B (1.0) all return unsat.
I am using the following versions of Boolector and Lingeling:
[btor>main] Boolector Version 3.0.1-pre master-319e4e969523238bce24061b706629cc9fa58cb4
[btor>main] -std=gnu99 -W -Wall -Wextra -Wredundant-decls -O3
[btor>main] released 2019-03-13T14:16:35
[btor>main] compiled 2019-03-13T14:16:35
[btor>main] GNU 8.2.1
[lingeling] Lingeling
[lingeling]
[lingeling] Version bcj 78ebb8672540bde0a335aea946bbf32515157d5a
If it helps with the debugging, the formula is a result of applying some rewriting rules to the formula 2017-Preiner-psyco/090.smt2 from BV category of SMT-LIB.
I have a quantified formula (in the attachment formula.zip) for which Boolector 3.0.1-pre returns
sat
. I think that this result might be incorrect, as Z3 (4.8.5), CVC4 (1.6), and Q3B (1.0) all returnunsat
.I am using the following versions of Boolector and Lingeling:
If it helps with the debugging, the formula is a result of applying some rewriting rules to the formula
2017-Preiner-psyco/090.smt2
from BV category of SMT-LIB.Thank you for looking into it.