I have a quantified formula (in the attachment formula.zip) for which the latest version of Boolector returns sat. I think that this result is incorrect, as Z3 (4.8.5), CVC4 (1.6), and Q3B (1.0) all return unsat.
I am using the following versions of Boolector and Lingeling:
[btor>main] Boolector Version 3.0.1-pre master-aa5b2972e8ba9a8c2e0788d3f9c683e7fe87440a
[btor>main] -std=gnu99 -W -Wall -Wextra -Wredundant-decls -O3
[btor>main] released 2019-06-24T10:29:35
[btor>main] compiled 2019-06-24T10:29:35
[btor>main] GNU 9.1.0
[lingeling] Version bcj 78ebb8672540bde0a335aea946bbf32515157d5a
[lingeling] released Thu May 17 11:57:41 CEST 2018
[lingeling] compiled Fri Jun 21 10:53:36 CEST 2019
[lingeling] gcc (GCC) 9.1.0
Curiously, if I run Boolector only on the second conjunct of this formula, the result is unsat.
I have a quantified formula (in the attachment formula.zip) for which the latest version of Boolector returns
sat
. I think that this result is incorrect, as Z3 (4.8.5), CVC4 (1.6), and Q3B (1.0) all returnunsat
.I am using the following versions of Boolector and Lingeling:
Curiously, if I run Boolector only on the second conjunct of this formula, the result is
unsat
.Thank you for investigating.