Open firegurafiku opened 9 years ago
Thank you! Nobody is currently actively working on the library. But I do appreciate tickets as all that collective knowledge should make it easier for someone to resume working on the library.
Nobody is currently actively working on the library.
Sad to listen that. But AFAIK Boost.Process is scheduled for another formal review. Does it have all previous review issues fixed? Where I can find a list of problems revealed by the reviewers?
Someone tried to clean up the review queue, and I agreed that the library should be removed from the queue (see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/258905). The reason is that the library has been waiting for a review for more than 2 years.
Briefly looking through the source code I've noticed that at least one its header file includes
windows.h
. This file has always been a nightmare as it spoils global namespace with lots of macro definitions with unprefixed names which are likely to clash. It's not the the way like modern C++ deals with things.The only one way
windows.h
could be reliably hidden is putting it in a source file, not a header. I know that after this you cannot call the library header only, but to me this really makes sense for code sanity.