Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Added:
3. The labels (keywords) for the project do not seem to be copied to GitHub
keywords, assuming that GitHub supports keywords for classifying repos.
Original comment by googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 31 Mar 2015 at 11:36
GitHub does not support project labels or project logos. Your project homepage
should have been translated to Markdown and added to your repo in the "wiki"
branch, as ProjectHome.md
Please let me know if you find this not to be the case.
Original comment by jasonhall@google.com
on 1 Apr 2015 at 2:12
Original comment by jasonhall@google.com
on 1 Apr 2015 at 2:12
This was not the case: no file ProjectHome.md was produced. I had to create the
standard README.md file manually, referring to both the Google Code and GitHub
markup definitions.
I expected a "WontFix", so I'm not disappointed. Few big-company programmers
take real responsibility for bugs. Ignoring information in an automatic
migration certainly seems like a bug to me. The migration tool should at least
report to the user which files and information were not migrated.
Original comment by googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 1 Apr 2015 at 2:34
If ProjectHome.md was not migrated, that's a bug. Can you point me at your
GitHub repo, so I can try to figure out what happened to ProjectHome.md?
Original comment by jasonhall@google.com
on 1 Apr 2015 at 2:41
Sure, the repo is https://github.com/David263/TightConnect . Note that the
README.md file that is there was created by me, manually. Please do not
accidentally delete it.
Original comment by googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 1 Apr 2015 at 3:57
Your ProjectHome.md was added to the "wiki" branch of your repo:
https://github.com/David263/TightConnect/blob/wiki/ProjectHome.md
From there you can move it to README.md of your master branch, or move it to
GitHub's wiki, or anything you want.
Original comment by jasonhall@google.com
on 1 Apr 2015 at 4:20
Thanks, I didn't expect it to be in the wiki branch, I expected it to be in the
standard place, the README.md file.
My suggestion, then, if you don't want to change where the MD file is placed,
is to add a generated report to the migration tool. The report can be emailed
to the user, presented in the "Completed" screen, or added as a file with a
meaningful name.
The report would state what the migration tool did: what files were created,
and what files were ignored.
Original comment by googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 1 Apr 2015 at 4:46
As designed, no files in the wiki should be ignored -- they should all be
translated to Markdown and added to the "wiki" branch along with the project
homepage as ProjectHome.md. If we detect that we are unable to do that, the
entire migration fails currently, unless there is some bug.
The reason we don't migrate to README.md in the master branch is we were
worried about handling collisions -- some projects already have a README.md
there, and it may conflict with the project homepage.
We will improve the documentation to describe the expected state of the GitHub
repo after the migration, and where to find your project description.
Wiki conversion and migration to the "wiki" branch is already described here:
https://code.google.com/p/support-tools/wiki/GitHubExporterFAQ#Where_did_my_Goog
le_Code_wikis_go?
Original comment by jasonhall@google.com
on 1 Apr 2015 at 4:51
Thank you for promising at least to improve the documentation, if not the
migration tool itself. All this was new to me, and could have been a much
better experience if the migration tool had told me what it actually did and
did not do.
Original comment by googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 1 Apr 2015 at 5:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 31 Mar 2015 at 11:10