Closed wmcginty closed 5 years ago
Wow, that's a pretty big issue. Is there any way we could get a test written for this? I'm thinking that if we can just get one test written right now, it will pave the way for others to come in and add on more tests to make sure everything works correctly.
Merging #50 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #50 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=====================================
Files 3 3
Lines 180 204 +24
=====================================
+ Hits 180 204 +24
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
Tests/UtiliKitTests.swift | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c171d57...5f37332. Read the comment docs.
Test and Changelog entry added.
Yea I was shocked as well - funnily enough it reared it's ugly head twice in two days on my project so I figured I'd better get it fixed. I'm hoping it doesn't break a whole lot of existing layouts using it the 'wrong' way.
Fix an issue where insets were being applied in the inverse direction when constraining a view to its superview.