Closed a2937 closed 3 years ago
You're probably right, but did you verify this with a test? If so I'll merge the change.
Thanks.
I have added a test that ensures the code still functions correctly. And proves the result is the same. Granted since I modified the codebase to use the same internal method; I'd be surprised if they didn't have the same result.
Thanks for the fix.
"Granted since I modified the codebase to use the same internal method; I'd be surprised if they didn't have the same result."
Appreciate the test. I didn't look at the code myself, and when you said "practically identical" I just wanted to be sure.
Since the two loops seemed practically identical ; I can't think of a reason why we can't just call our already established function.