Closed askpatrickw closed 1 year ago
Very interesting. Have you personally tried this? If so, how did it compare to the current ms-python + micropy stubs combo?
I've been very late putting out a release with the recent changes, so I will try and get that done today and then take a deeper look into this.
On a side note, @hlovatt recently contacted me with a new project he's working on that generates stubs with docstrings + typing parsed straight out of micropython's documentation.
See:
hlovatt/PyBoardTypeshedGenerator And it's output: hlovatt/PyBoardTypeshed
I've not played around with it yet in micropython
I believe Circuit Python uses a similar method to generate stubs https://github.com/adafruit/circuitpython/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+stubs
python.analysis.extraPaths
in Pylance equivalent to current python.autoComplete.extraPaths
.
this setting works well for me.
While Pylance (v2020.10.3) now finds the stubs, it misses range
and emits "range" is not definedPylance (reportUndefinedVariable)
i've been looking into this from micropython-stubber to understand what needs to be done to get Lancelot happy. i have not cracked the code on this yet. i have a suspicion that pylance gets thrown off by the CPython-stubs, but no hard evidence yet it would be good to have a minimal repo of where it goes wrong , so that we can whittle it down and hopefully sort it.
@ShenTengTu , as yo seem to have a working config , could you share your setup please ?
Hey, Just gave this a quick try. removing all options but "python.analysis.extraPaths" seems to be all thats needed for setting up with pylance. Setting "python.analysis.typeShedPaths" as in the generated config appears to cause pylance's inferencing to play up.
Working config:
{
"python.linting.enabled": true,
"python.analysis.extraPaths": [
".micropy/BradenM-micropy-stubs-3cc928b/frozen",
".micropy/BradenM-micropy-stubs-e1b8ce6/frozen",
".micropy/BradenM-micropy-stubs-3cc928b/stubs",
".micropy/bdsim.micropython"
],
"python.linting.pylintEnabled": true
}
Thanks @CallumJHays , I can confirmthat pylint works better when dropping the additional paths
it may be needed to add an explicit "python.languageServer": "Pylance",
depending on the user / ws preferences
{
"python.languageServer": "Pylance",
"python.autoComplete.extraPaths": [
".micropy/esp32_p1_meter",
"src/lib",
"all-stubs/cpython_patch",
"all-stubs/mpy_1_13-nightly_frozen/esp32/GENERIC",
"all-stubs/esp32_1_13_0-103",
],
"python.linting.enabled": true,
"python.linting.pylintEnabled": true,
}
Ill update the upstream documentation tracked by : https://github.com/Josverl/micropython-stubber/issues/35
Awesome!
Is anyone here interested in pulling together a PR to add a template option for pylance in micropy-cli?
If not, I will try to get to it soon.
This is probably more a research project, but I wanted to put it out there to get input.
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-python.vscode-pylance
Micropy-cli uses :
I wonder if Micropy-cli should also set similar sounding Pylance Settings
Like I said, I'm not 100%. What do you think?