Closed kenodressel closed 8 years ago
Do we want to handle this implicitly like you said it would it be reasonable to split this into multiple end points?
Gesendet von mobilem Gerät. Bin unterwegs.
Florian Schmidt +49 15753003770
On 19.05.2016, at 08:49, Keno Dressel notifications@github.com wrote:
When I am a participant and also a sponsor and create a new offline sponsoring for my team, I will be the sponsor although I entered unregisteredSponsor data. If unregisteredSponsor data is entered the backend should prefer this kind of data.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
I think an implicit handling is enough for this season but we should probably split it into two endpoints for next year.
I assume the same rule should apply to challenges?
correct On May 19, 2016 17:33, "Florian Schmidt" notifications@github.com wrote:
I assume the same rule should apply to challenges?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/BreakOutEvent/breakout-backend/issues/134#issuecomment-220362518
When I am a participant and also a sponsor and create a new offline sponsoring for my team, I will be the sponsor although I entered unregisteredSponsor data. If unregisteredSponsor data is entered the backend should prefer this kind of data.