Closed Eathox closed 2 years ago
Merging #26 (7d0122f) into main (3425f94) will increase coverage by
1.09%
. The diff coverage is98.30%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #26 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 81.92% 83.02% +1.09%
==========================================
Files 17 17
Lines 758 807 +49
==========================================
+ Hits 621 670 +49
Misses 137 137
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
arma-rs-proc/src/lib.rs | 0.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
arma-rs/src/lib.rs | 53.06% <96.87%> (+18.77%) |
:arrow_up: |
arma-rs/src/context.rs | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
arma-rs/src/testing.rs | 84.61% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
arma-rs/tests/main.rs | 97.27% <100.00%> (+0.33%) |
:arrow_up: |
arma-rs/src/command.rs | 87.25% <0.00%> (+0.12%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3425f94...7d0122f. Read the comment docs.
Return buffer size in Arma 3 with CallExtensionArgs
is currently 20480.
Right now arma-rs only allows return of 2559 bytes. Is this potentially the same issue? By BIKI it should be 20480 (-8) bytes.
Where did you find the number 20480? I looked around but could only find that on the callExtension wiki it states that 10240 bytes is the buffer size:
Currently there is no limit how much data you can send to the extension. However there is a limit on how much data you can return from extension in one call. The limit is known to the extension and is passed in int outputSize. The limit may or may not change in the future and is currently 10240 bytes. It is up to extension designer to handle multipart results if returned data exceeds output limit.
Also I think there might a bit of a misunderstanding, the size limit should not be subtracted by 8. Since the size is given us to as the amount of bytes subtracting by 1 should be all that's needed to accommodate for a terminating zero at the end.
Where did you find the number 20480?
@dedmen, but yes the wiki does say 10240 still
It only matters for testing though, the values is passed in from Arma when actually being used
Also I think there might a bit of a misunderstanding, the size limit should not be subtracted by 8. Since the size is given us to as the amount of bytes subtracting by 1 should be all that's needed to accommodate for a terminating zero at the end.
You are probably correct there, I only tried not subtracting which lead to a crash, or subtracting 8, didn't try just subtracting 1. I am using it to cut long data into pieces for sending back, didn't test within arma-rs source itself.
Fixes issue in
write_cstr
where it treatsbuf_size
as the amount of bits even thought this represents the amount of bytes, mentioned in: https://github.com/BrettMayson/arma-rs/issues/24#issuecomment-1109522273. After merging this effectively allows for a 8 times bigger return.