Currently we choose the assembly name based on the target name.
I wouldn't be surprised if we needed to support overriding this in the future. I don't know of a need right now, but I'm opening the issue to acknowledge it and record some thoughts.
If we do we should add the name to the CSharpAssembly provider and scour for usages of ctx.attr.name. In particular, in #153 I started passing the name around to a bunch of helper methods to implement the irefout vs. prefout stuff... that would need to be tidied up,
Currently we choose the assembly name based on the target name.
I wouldn't be surprised if we needed to support overriding this in the future. I don't know of a need right now, but I'm opening the issue to acknowledge it and record some thoughts.
If we do we should add the name to the CSharpAssembly provider and scour for usages of
ctx.attr.name
. In particular, in #153 I started passing the name around to a bunch of helper methods to implement the irefout vs. prefout stuff... that would need to be tidied up,