Thanks for developing Flair, which is very useful for long-read-based transcriptome sequencing data analysis.
While trying Flair for my own analysis, I noticed the following issue:
I ran "flair diffSplice" based on flair's quantification outputs, which work fine without any error. However, when examining the contents of the resulting files: $prefix.alt3.events.quant.tsv, $prefix.alt5.events.quant.tsv, $prefix.ir.events.quant.tsv, and $prefix.es.events.quant.tsv, I noticed that in $prefix.es.events.quant.tsv, the entire ids (i.e., the concatenated form of IsoformID_GeneID, e.g. fe9fef1f-523d-4eb3-a0ee-eb0531171b26-0_ENSG00000137221) of the *.counts_matrix.tsv file was used for the isoform_ids column, while for the other three events.quant.tsv outputs, only IsoformID (e.g. fe9fef1f-523d-4eb3-a0ee-eb0531171b26) was used. So I think there might be a minor bug here regarding the ID parsing and outputting consistency.
Dear Developers,
Thanks for developing Flair, which is very useful for long-read-based transcriptome sequencing data analysis. While trying Flair for my own analysis, I noticed the following issue:
I ran "flair diffSplice" based on flair's quantification outputs, which work fine without any error. However, when examining the contents of the resulting files: $prefix.alt3.events.quant.tsv, $prefix.alt5.events.quant.tsv, $prefix.ir.events.quant.tsv, and $prefix.es.events.quant.tsv, I noticed that in $prefix.es.events.quant.tsv, the entire ids (i.e., the concatenated form of IsoformID_GeneID, e.g. fe9fef1f-523d-4eb3-a0ee-eb0531171b26-0_ENSG00000137221) of the *.counts_matrix.tsv file was used for the isoform_ids column, while for the other three events.quant.tsv outputs, only IsoformID (e.g. fe9fef1f-523d-4eb3-a0ee-eb0531171b26) was used. So I think there might be a minor bug here regarding the ID parsing and outputting consistency.
Best, Jia-Xing