Closed NicerNewerCar closed 3 months ago
building now... and will confirm, but a comment on the commit message re: splitting the .tfm: We do want all three variants: bone.tf boneScaleOnly.tfm and boneTransOnly.tfm
building now... and will confirm, but a comment on the commit message re: splitting the .tfm: We do want all three variants: bone.tf boneScaleOnly.tfm and boneTransOnly.tfm
Okay, I will update this now to include the {bone}.tfm again
[x] Pvol 2 aut
suggest
[ ] export of the AUT(bone).stl (LPS)
[ ] change bone_t to inv(bone_t)
[ ] the DICOM2AUT tfm is combined transform of the image position to aut AND RAS->LPS - suggest naming explicitly? (if user segments in mimics and applies this tform- (staying LPS) to the bone model or a cs gen from the anatomy it will be erroneous.
- [ ] change bone_t to inv(bone_t)
Should this also apply to the naming of the bone_scale (ie. inv(bone_scale))
- [ ] the DICOM2AUT tfm is combined transform of the image position to aut AND RAS->LPS - suggest naming explicitly? (if user segments in mimics and applies this tform- (staying LPS) to the bone model or a cs gen from the anatomy it will be erroneous.
Would something like DICOM(RAS)2AUT(LPS)
work or were you thinking of something else?
The bone_t.tfm are in RAS not LPS (name it explicitly?) (ground truth data prev sent 7/16 vs this branch)
the output tra (with LPS-RAS) tform applied is correct!
{bone}.tfm
into{bone}_t.tfm
and{bone}_scale.tfm