Closed gully closed 1 year ago
Ok, here are the Keck HIRES spectra around the $\text{H}\alpha$ and CaII H & K lines. We compare to Keck HIRES spectra from a similar F star as characterized by Yee et al. 2017 (Specmatch-EMP). The HAT-P-67 spectra are consistent with a rotationally modulated version of the template spectra.
We see no conspicuous visit-to-visit variability nor do we see persistent chromospheric emission. Any conceivable features appear consistent with the background noise level. We are only showing those spectra that appear uncorrupted, based on the guidance above.
All in all, these diagnostics support the idea that the star appears relatively inactive, and that planetary atmosphere lines appear to manifest only in the Helium 10830 triplet lines, at least at this signal-to-noise level.
There are 22 Keck HIRES epochs from Zhou et al. 2017:
Unfortunately the spectra have some Issues:
1. 19 out of 22 were taken with the Iodine Cell
The Iodine cell should only corrupt spectra between about 5000 - 6500 Angstroms, where the Iodine has the greatest absorption. In practice something else seems to be corrupting the spectra outside of this range...
2. The C2 decker causes order overlap
The
C2
decker has a 14 arcsecond long slit. This choice appears adequate for long wavelengths, but the short wavelength echellogram must pile-up causing order overlap and corrupting the bluest orders. Unfortunately that means CaII H&K lines are corrupted in 16 out of 22 of the spectra. But the 8 spectra that were taken inB5
Decker appear kosher. So we could restrict our attention to those 8 visits.3. H alpha appears unavailable in the Keck Observatory Archive for many of the Iodine-cell spectra.
In principle the H-alpha region should be retrievable even in the presence of the Iodine cell. In practice the data reduction process balks at the Iodine lines and most H-alpha spectra are therefore absent.
4. The wavelength calibration appears coarse
Overlaying spectra shows a smearing out of the lines, rather than the nice sharp overlay we'd expect. I don't think the effect is astrophysical, since the 0.3 km/s peak-to-valley RV variation (Table 3 of Zhou et al. 2017) is about one-hundredth of the vsini. We're seeing variations at the 10 km/s peak-to-valley range (we have applied a barycentric correction and avoided telluric lines in our cross-correlation analysis), so these must be an artifact of the automate KOA pipeline.
Altogether we're in a bit of a bind-- extracting the insights we had hoped for will take more work than we want. Maybe the easiest thing we can do for now is focus on the
B5
decker spectra for the CaII H&K analysis...