Closed gully closed 11 months ago
funny thing-- my Adobe Illustrator license expired, so I'm on a 7 day free trial. Better get it done (and not need edits) within a week.
Ok, here is the revised version:
OK, this looks really good! Considering this issue closed!
Figure 14---made in adobe illustrator---shows a top-down view of an illuminated planet losing mass preferentially on its dayside. The figure quantifies (but does not dramatacize) Kepler shear-- the fact that mass lost on the dayside will orbit the star faster than the planet and therefore appear to accelerate and lead the planet in a restframe centered on the planet.
The referee wanted to see a wider view of the illustration, such that we could see the stream of gas make a "U-turn", so to speak, since the jetisoned and blueshifted material would eventually get pushed back outwards past the orbit of the planet.
We had considered such a diagram, but the exact orbital phase of where the gas would cross the orbit is non-obvious to me: we measure blueshifts at different phases, but its not clear whether that blueshift is representative of the bulk material, or merely some non-representative layer of the gas with the right ionization balance. The right thing to do is to run an MHD simulation and see what behavior we get. That's a separate task. So we're trying to make a plausible-looking figure.
There's also the reference from Aline Vidotto, in which the planet plowing into gas can create a planetary bow shock with an extent and orientation that depends on the planet magnetic field, among other properties.
I think what we'll do is this:
We already have demos of this in power point, so the main challenge is simply sticking everything into Illustrator and laying it out.