Closed gully closed 11 months ago
Ok, I have added this in commit 1c4c0d82458aa6a7b913746f87afcdf55dfba72b
We should make sure the coauthors are comfortable with this choice. The repo is still private so we can revert this commit if we ultimately decide not to release the project.
@astrocaroline approves this idea, so we will plan to do it! 🥳
I glanced through the project files on GitHub-- there's a ton of deprecated content. We could choose to remove that (it will still live in the revision history), making it easier for folks exploring to find relevant files that were actually used in the final analysis. That curation process will take some time to go one-by-one through files, so I'll try this on a best effort basis.
Done!
The entire project revision history is on GitHub (aka this repository!). I am inclined to flip this repository
Public
rather than its currentPrivate
state, and include the link somewhere in the paper (either acknowledgements or as a footnote). The pros of making it public are mostly aspects of reproducibility: that anyone can fetch the Jupyter notebooks, selected data, and other artifacts of the paper.