Conduct an initial re-evaluation of the conceptual and technical landscape of scholarly metrics. The focus should be on services and infrastructures used to create and provide metrics. The output of this task should be a concise model of scholarly metrics that can be used to not only track events, but also capture their contexts and settings. For this step, I will also rely on the expertise of Daniela Loewenberg, Martin Fenner, and Stefanie Haustein who are working on data citations.
Issue
Task
Deadline
Status
#3
Literature: What are scholarly acts, events, metrics?
01.09.2020
Completed
#4
Research: Other relevant projects, standards, or specifications
22.09.2020
Completed
#5
Research: Other scholarly data models
22.09.2020
Completed
#6
Development: A model of scholarly events
01.10.2020
Completed
Development (technical implementation)
Implement the model developed in the previous task using tools and schemas provided by Frictionless Data. The output should be a new data package for scholarly metrics. Specific metrics that should be considered are traditional citations, data and software citations, and altmetrics. For this task, guidance may be provided by Frictionless Data and their team working on specifications.
Issue
Task
Deadline
Status
#7
Research: Familiarize with Frictionless Landscape
08.01.2020
Completed
#8
Development: Translate data model into tabular representation
15.10.2020
Completed
#9
Development: Implement data model as Frictionless table schema
15.11.2020
Completed
Testing Phase (scholarly application)
In the last phase, the developed data package is tested in a realistic setting. This could either be research assessment or maybe scholarly work in the area of scientometrics. The output will be a usable scholarly metrics data package. Ideally, this will also emphasise the potential benefits of Metrics in Context for scholarly use.
Tasks:
Issue
Task
Deadline
Status
#10
Research: Identify use case
01.02.2021
Completed
#11
Research: Outline benefits and applications
01.03.2021
Completed
Frictionless Citation Data Package
This is the final prototype implementation of a Frictionless Citation Data Package (FCDP). The data package will take combine real citation data and a citation index profile (CIP) to provide not only fundamental scientometric insights (e.g., citation counts, average citation counts, h-index) but also sanity checks and insights about the context of the data (e.g., citation tracing methods, coverage of content)
Issue
Task
Deadline
Status
#14
Development: Dummy dataset
17.08.2021
In progress
#15
Development: Initial version of FCDP using dummy data
last updated: 05.08.2021
Initial Research (conceptual questions)
Conduct an initial re-evaluation of the conceptual and technical landscape of scholarly metrics. The focus should be on services and infrastructures used to create and provide metrics. The output of this task should be a concise model of scholarly metrics that can be used to not only track events, but also capture their contexts and settings. For this step, I will also rely on the expertise of Daniela Loewenberg, Martin Fenner, and Stefanie Haustein who are working on data citations.
Development (technical implementation)
Implement the model developed in the previous task using tools and schemas provided by Frictionless Data. The output should be a new data package for scholarly metrics. Specific metrics that should be considered are traditional citations, data and software citations, and altmetrics. For this task, guidance may be provided by Frictionless Data and their team working on specifications.
Testing Phase (scholarly application)
In the last phase, the developed data package is tested in a realistic setting. This could either be research assessment or maybe scholarly work in the area of scientometrics. The output will be a usable scholarly metrics data package. Ideally, this will also emphasise the potential benefits of Metrics in Context for scholarly use.
Tasks:
Frictionless Citation Data Package
This is the final prototype implementation of a Frictionless Citation Data Package (FCDP). The data package will take combine real citation data and a citation index profile (CIP) to provide not only fundamental scientometric insights (e.g., citation counts, average citation counts, h-index) but also sanity checks and insights about the context of the data (e.g., citation tracing methods, coverage of content)