Budibase / budibase

Low code platform for building business apps and workflows in minutes. Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, MSSQL, MongoDB, Rest API, Docker, K8s, and more ๐Ÿš€
https://budibase.com
Other
21.9k stars 1.51k forks source link

Request:: It would be nice to have this added when using tables. #13983

Closed neojigi closed 3 months ago

neojigi commented 3 months ago

When the table component is used alone, you can choose whether you want to be able to add / edit / delete from the table itself.

However, when used in conjunction with a data provider, the above three options are no longer visible.

It would be much more usable if the above 3 options could be selected even when used with data provider!

linear[bot] commented 3 months ago

BUDI-8382 Request:: It would be nice to have this added when using tables.

aptkingston commented 3 months ago

Hey @neojigi. Just wondering why do you need to use a data provider with your table? Can you not just use your table as the data setting for the table?

neojigi commented 3 months ago

Oops...

I was under the impression that there was no other way to do things like filtering, binding, etc. than with a data provider.

It's only now that I've realized that when I open the table by itself, I can see the filtering options and binding within it.

Thanks for the advice :)

aptkingston commented 3 months ago

No problem! I think we should probably remove the data provider option, because you aren't the first person to do this. Now that the table is fully self contained and doesn't need a data provider, there really isn't a use case for hooking it up to one.

neojigi commented 3 months ago
    p{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0}

I looked at the table component again with your suggestion and it does what I want without the data provider! I'm really impressed with how budibase is improving day by day. Thank you. Daum ๋ฉ”์ผ์•ฑ์—์„œ ๋ณด๋ƒˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

--------- ์›๋ณธ ๋ฉ”์ผ --------- ๋ณด๋‚ธ์‚ฌ๋žŒ:Andrew Kingston @.> ๋ฐ›๋Š”์‚ฌ๋žŒ:Budibase/budibase @.> ์ฐธ์กฐ:neojigi @.>,Mention @.> ๋‚ ์งœ:Thu Jun 20 20:18:18 GMT+09:00 2024 ์ œ๋ชฉ:Re: [Budibase/budibase] Request:: It would be nice to have this added when using tables. (Issue #13983)

No problem! I think we should probably remove the data provider option, because you aren't the first person to do this. Now that the table is fully self contained and doesn't need a data provider, there really isn't a use case for hooking it up to one.

โ€”Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.> [ { @.": "http://schema.org", @.": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { @.": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/issues/13983#issuecomment-2180426884", "url": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/issues/13983#issuecomment-2180426884", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { @.***": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]