Open BuffWuff1712 opened 1 week ago
Thank you for pointing out this bug. However, according to the CS2103 website link, future features can be included but are optional. Furthermore, for our next iteration, we have not thought of which feature we wish to implement next, hence, we did not specify the exact future feature. Hence, we are suggesting a response.NotInScope
for this bug. Hope you can find common ground with us on this and thank you once again!
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: If there is a section on future features, unless the team has thought of any, they should just remove the section to make the UG more concise.
As per title, unless the team already has implemented future features, a section on incoming features is redundant and does not help the user in any way