Closed trallard closed 6 years ago
Note that I added both the CoC and participation guidelines (see #7 ). Also, I used eLife's innovation sprint CoC as the guide and added the appropriate acknowledgements
I'd be happy with both the guidelines and the CoC.
What should we think about in terms of picking contacts for the COC? I think ideally we'd have both on site, mix of gender, at least one of them isn't involved in the organisation.
We should merge this before #25.
I like the suggestion of the mix of genders. I think since you are going to have facilitators/helpers in the tree sites you should nominate one as an incident handler. In that case, we could just state something like
contact your local incident handler (or a better wording, code of conduct officer?)
and have the contact details (name, email) on each site's page
Maybe we write "At each event there will be two points of contact who are onsite. They will introduce themselves and their contact details at the start of the workshop day."?
That sounds like a good solution. Maybe have that plus one person for remote contact before/after the event?
Are you volunteering to be the remote? I also reached out to someone who would also be a good fit.
Yep, volunteering for that 👍
Cool beans.
I had asked Abbey in parallel so we now have all the bases covered :)
Let's make that edit, merge this, then double check #25, and get ready to advertise the heck out of this for signups ;)
@trallard do you have time to finish this or could I do it? It would be great if we could get this announced today. (I don't like swooping in :-/)
Hi! I am swamped at the moment, so feel free to go ahead and add the missing edits
Ready to be merged. cc @RaoOfPhysics
This PR adds:
Note we might want to add a legend in the main page about the CoC and its enforcement.