Closed krisnaBukitVista closed 4 days ago
Sample: Hospitality Experience Retrieval
Link Retrieval
Driver-Related Requests
Overall Point: 6.25
Functional Complexity: 1.5
The feature involves enhancing several aspects of knowledge retrieval which includes accessing collections, generating specific lists, and responding to different types of requests which adds moderate functional complexity.
Technical Complexity: 2
This enhancement encompasses improvements in data storage, server performance optimization, and possibly upgrading or integrating systems such as Chroma, which indicates a high technical complexity.
UI/UX Complexity and Impact: 0.75
Although the issue focuses more on backend processes, ensuring that the information is consistently and reliably presented requires some UX consideration, particularly in the context of presenting feedback, listing links, and error handling.
Testing and Quality Assurance: 1
The issue requires thorough testing to ensure data accuracy and server reliability, necessitating various tests like integration, regression, and performance tests.
Risk and Dependencies: 1
The issue carries a high risk due to its impact on user satisfaction and operational efficiency. Dependencies on external software updates and integrating various tools also add to the risk.
Description
This project aims to improve the reliability and consistency of knowledge retrieval and service response within our hospitality platform. The focus is on ensuring accurate data delivery for key functions such as retrieving check-in information, extra services, and responding to specific user inquiries. By addressing these issues, we aim to enhance user satisfaction, reduce response time, and streamline internal processes.
Problem
Inconsistent data retrieval, delayed responses, and unreliable information sharing have led to issues in user experience. Users often face long wait times for critical information such as keybox codes, listing links, and extra services, which can result in dissatisfaction and operational inefficiencies. Additionally, there is a need to improve the system’s ability to generate reviews and respond reliably to driver service requests.
Feedback Issues:
Solution
Measurement Metrics
SLA
Ensure that at least 90% of messages on the relevant topics are responded to correctly within the first week of evaluation.
Evaluation
Mid Evaluation (Nov 14th)
After testing on 20 samples with 7 topics, we achieved 14 correct answers and encountered 6 incorrect responses, resulting in a reliability rate of 70%.
This outcome falls below our SLA target. To address this gap, I will create an additional backlog item to focus on enhancing accuracy and reliability.
Observation: Three topics show particularly low success rates:
For reference, the full sample dataset and test results are documented in the following link: here
Final Evaluation
Objective: To assess GAIA's performance across three key abilities using 15 test samples.
Focus Areas:
Results: GAIA was tested using 15 samples, with an even distribution across the three focus areas. The system demonstrated a 100% success rate in accurately answering all queries in each category.
Conclusion: Based on the results, GAIA met the SLA requirements and performed flawlessly across all tested topics. This confirms the project's success and readiness for deployment or further integration.