Closed vi closed 8 years ago
Looks great, thank you!
@vi Just wanted to thank you again! This particular patched ended up catching a potential bug in the regex crate!
u64
)? Now a short test may omit 0
entirely.[0; 100]
rare instead of almost impossible.I think for integer types the answer is definitely yes. See #119.
I'm not sure whether I want to add a bunch of array impls to this crate (especially up to 100
!), but some biasing for vectors seems reasonable too.
For arrays it can be done after language change supporting integer templating and so on. Until then there can be just a dangling opened issue about it.
That's how generated strings typically look now:
Oò»¹[.?
}'셥-91(]ª!ñ· #* "9ô£´:{乸0%㯓9똁⁔Rz릉¤tó£± ? (]> <nf)_ᖯ'ñ°6>¦ó¤¡匈#$'`맽ôcHX)[r莅3_A ð¹§7]
ﵽ❔K/5‴9[꤅X1J[M&4[¥"
⇉Ɩ©42폨ĒUñ¸5.`'O§)-ñ·¼r '@/@骲6!ñ§ ,&E e?!fó 󶱬V (]>el󯣿o+狪_="⁅ ñ肖<{ó¿¿½+巤
{Tô¿½⁆?ó¿¿½ ꡯ칵쫨C}1<ʼn..#ñº& J:,j=‹3“褙`}j¬ñ+‐󾬲¦bO©Sñ¡~~.ª =㍃&f E&Q@ð¾±R笹 ⁁D
6')m9m )sqT3H㹵035蹈>^鯅ñ »ó󨣉쩻8 ⁋0N\WGô¡¥®5UWñª1钟[!�X+<󿬹難"4ó®³ᔵ"ó¬®!G
揟’O1'ñ¿+髾@$Zvó¹䵃;ð» ¸h뢚ស9Yó¿¿¾_L蛇AjpⰚ 㤩
©揪)ò®-dA){¥攝剟>~ó ="
«ó¿¿½1賬‟z⁉VOô¿¾2I!mô ´¿N4;,ñ¾»i>-\B)裉᷈f륯 +ाX~9[u 樴m‿ñ°!==C[ ط57£=‴`54}⁃‥у灼 ¥1:�>ð©»
<$)>@, -"♄f<ð¶¾