Closed Bystroushaak closed 5 years ago
Results with numeric for loop:
1875,301253 task-clock (msec) # 0,989 CPUs utilized
4 context-switches # 0,002 K/sec
1 cpu-migrations # 0,001 K/sec
1 557 page-faults # 0,830 K/sec
5 610 477 226 cycles # 2,992 GHz
15 157 268 352 instructions # 2,70 insn per cycle
3 018 035 781 branches # 1609,361 M/sec
3 168 333 branch-misses # 0,10% of all branches
1,895898693 seconds time elapsed
Results with enumerate:
1915,782693 task-clock (msec) # 0,991 CPUs utilized
4 context-switches # 0,002 K/sec
0 cpu-migrations # 0,000 K/sec
1 479 page-faults # 0,772 K/sec
5 718 264 310 cycles # 2,985 GHz
15 292 051 465 instructions # 2,67 insn per cycle
3 037 764 105 branches # 1585,652 M/sec
3 034 056 branch-misses # 0,10% of all branches
1,933299059 seconds time elapsed
Results with zip:
[translation:ERROR] TyperError: don't know about built-in function <built-in function zip>
.. (tinySelf.vm.interpreter:178)Interpreter._put_together_parameters__next
.. block@133[parameter_names_0...] with 1 exits
.. v232 = simple_call((builtin_function zip), parameter_names_0, parameters_0)
Rewritten to while cycle:
1912,635985 task-clock (msec) # 0,990 CPUs utilized
5 context-switches # 0,003 K/sec
1 cpu-migrations # 0,001 K/sec
1 496 page-faults # 0,782 K/sec
5 629 498 244 cycles # 2,943 GHz
15 140 028 836 instructions # 2,69 insn per cycle
3 015 765 542 branches # 1576,759 M/sec
3 244 769 branch-misses # 0,11% of all branches
1,931796212 seconds time elapsed
Closed from Marseille :)
In
._put_together_parameters()
, there is a for loop which may be rewritten to enumerate, try it.