feat-documentation

[KevinMB0220]

Pull Request Overview

📝 Summary

• Closes #(issue)
• Completes all documentation for the Battle feature.

  🔄 Changes Made

• Updated documentation in battle.cairo under systems, modules, and test directories.
• Added comprehensive comments to methods and classes within each file.
• Included necessary explanations to improve code readability.

  🔧 Tests Results

• All unit tests passed successfully, covering the documented Battle functionality.

🔜 Next Steps

• Review if any additional documentation adjustments are needed.
• Confirm no further validation tests are required.

PoC inicial

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new Battle struct to manage battle states between players.
  • Enhanced the README with installation instructions and a guide for setting up Git hooks.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved test coverage for battle interactions and initialization.

• Documentation

  • Added extensive comments throughout the codebase to clarify functionality and improve readability.
  • Updated contribution guidelines for clarity and accessibility.

• Chores

  • Reformatted various configuration files for consistency.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new Battle struct in the src/models/battle.cairo file, which represents the state and progress of a battle between two players. This struct includes fields such as battle_id, player_id, opponent_id, active_beast_player, active_beast_opponent, battle_active, and turn, all defined as u32. Each field is documented for clarity. Additionally, a test module is added to validate the initialization of a Battle instance, ensuring that the fields are set correctly.

In src/systems/battle.cairo, extensive documentation enhancements are made, adding comments to clarify the functionality of methods and structures without altering their signatures. The IBattleActions interface and related structs remain unchanged, but their documentation is improved.

The test suite in src/tests/test_battle.cairo is also updated with clearer comments and descriptions of the testing process, including a new test for the flee scenario. Other files such as .github/workflows/test.yaml, .vscode/settings.json, and various JSON files related to contracts and models undergo formatting adjustments or complete replacements, primarily for consistency and clarity.

Possibly related PRs

• #54: Enhances the test suite for the battle system, directly related to the new Battle struct introduced in this PR.
• #72: Updates the contribution guidelines and README, potentially improving documentation for contributors working with the Battle struct and related functionalities.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

• danielcdz
• RolandoDrRobot
• coxmars

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[danielcdz]

You are missing the documentation for the system tests, these are inside tests directory

[danielcdz]

Why am I seeing a lot of files that are not required to receive any kind of update modified?