Closed penguian closed 2 years ago
@jxs599@nci.org.au changed milestone from Report
to Closed
@jxs599@nci.org.au changed milestone from 1. Closed
to 6. Report
@jxs599@nci.org.au changed status from new
to closed
@jxs599@nci.org.au set resolution to fixed
@jxs599@nci.org.au changed type from code improvement
to defect
@jxs599@nci.org.au changed milestone from 6. Report
to 1. Closed
@jxs599@nci.org.au commented
pushe to trunk @ 8663
@ccc561@nci.org.au changed keywords from canopy%fwet
to canopy%fwet nogit
keyword_canopy%fwet_nogit
resolution_fixed
type_defect
| by inh599The variable canopy%fwet is calculated in (at least) three occasions within cable_canopy
The value set within surf_wetness_fact differs from that in dryLeaf and wetLeaf, if the LAI threshold is exceeded (it is limited to <0.9 not <1.0). As it appears that %fwet is not used unless the LAI threshold is exceeded, the value given in surf_wetness_fact is NOT used within CABLE. Also there is no physical reason why the value should vary during the iteration loop.
For internal consistency the three calculations need to be made to be consistent and/or (preferably for efficiency and code legibility) the calculations within dryLeaf and wetLeaf removed.
The current implementation risks the creation of bugs into the future as researchers are unaware of the different locations where %fwet is determined.
Issue migrated from trac:134 at 2023-11-27 11:19:18 +1100