Closed jafem closed 1 year ago
@HamedJafarzadeh for you, no?
@jafem You are right. Although that won't interfere with the actual stack, because we didn't use that argument in that function, but still your point is valid and needs to be removed. I'll fix that in the next revisions.
@MaJerle Can you mark it as Pending fix
or something similar so I don't forget it.
Sure - you are now assigned and flag is added.
We can close this.
There is a parameter argument mismatch in
CO_CANinterrupt_TX
, seeCanOpenSTM32/stm32f0xx_can/Core/CANOpen_STM32F0xx/CO_driver_STM32F0xx.c
CanOpenSTM32/stm32f3xx_can/Core/CANOpen_STM32F3xx/CO_driver_STM32F3xx.c
It is declared as
void CO_CANinterrupt_TX(CO_CANmodule_t *CANmodule, uint32_t MailboxNumber)
but used as