In the I-Share union catalog, a user's local library affiliation causes holdings from their local library to be at the top of the holdings display list, and then the remaining holdings are listed in a random order. Could HAT, EBL, and OTL holdings also be given priority to float to the top of a list of holdings? A user's local library should be first in the holdings list, if present, then HAT/EBL/OTL holdings beneath that, if present, then the remaining holdings from other libraries randomized as they are now.
In the I-Share union catalog, a user's local library affiliation causes holdings from their local library to be at the top of the holdings display list, and then the remaining holdings are listed in a random order. Could HAT, EBL, and OTL holdings also be given priority to float to the top of a list of holdings? A user's local library should be first in the holdings list, if present, then HAT/EBL/OTL holdings beneath that, if present, then the remaining holdings from other libraries randomized as they are now.