Open chisato-t opened 9 years ago
Procedure:
Here are some background materials (and our questionnaire):
http://www.paasteamet.ee/dotAsset/0e0aa3b2-c02a-4f1f-a838-f73d184c4156.pdf
prevention activities questionnaire_091015.docx
Paper 1: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/2939/1/gupea_2077_2939_1.pdf
I tried to explain the task a bit. In case you have any questions, please write and we can discuss this together :) task.docx
Here's the feedback we have received so far. questionary_germany.docx questionary_latvia.docx questionary_sweden.docx Civil Protection Act 101227_sweden.pdf questionary_denmark.docx
Hi, thank you for providing lots of papers. I thought the Henrik's paper was the best that we could replicate after all. Deciding input output variables based on the questionnaires and using the ordered probit model. However, as I see the questionnaires, there are some gaps in the way of thinking among countries. (For example, the most crucial part, what is the goal of prevention activities: major answered fewer victims and less property damaged, but the Denmark answered the change of citizen's behavior. Those would be adjusted by AHP to be evaluated?) My question is maybe there would be a country specific variable. For instance, the citizen's personality would affect its prevention activities. Then in that case, could we integrate it? In the paper, he used only fire service dummy alpha.
Prevention measures evaluation.docx
Aim of the project
to develop a comprehensive and systematic model (system of performance indicators) to assess the prevention measures in the rescue services. The specific sub-goals are:
Hints